The District of Coldstream's motto--Nulli Secundus--needs to be changed.
Translated from Latin meaning "second to none", it's now become a sad reminder of this Mayor and Council's term.
They just don't seem to get it.
When communities such as adjacent Kelowna and Armstrong state "we don't do that to residences," Coldstream's elected officials are not prepared to let go of this newly-found Golden Goose. Stating "no, we won't rescind the bylaw (designating residential homeowners as Developers and triggering unpredictable and varied off-site works charges)," incumbent mayor Jim Garlick appeared frustrated during the second All Candidates' Forum at Coldstream School on Tuesday night, presumably because such a hue and cry from building contractors and their association, realtors, and homeowners had resulted.
Ignoring his own councillor's twice-uttered statement "This is a public relations nightmare," (Councillor Cochrane), Mayor Garlick stated that the bylaw was under review...again. This even after Council and the Mayor in October gave third reading to the $50,000 "trigger point" at which--in any consecutive five-year period--a homeowner's building permit application could, and would, trigger off-site works charges.
"We may have to look at certain roads/areas in Coldstream where work is needed", Mayor Garlick offered as a consideration to the audience of 100+ attendees on Tuesday.
As though that would provide any predictability!
He's obviously forgotten Carla Dahlen's presentation to council in October, where she indicated she was a Realtor and asked Council "what do I tell prospective buyers of property in Coldstream?...how do you tell someone that the District may require costs/gifts for off-site works?" Neither her question, nor summation, and indeed not her occupation were recorded in the minutes of the meeting, as she offered "Or do I just tell people not to buy in Coldstream?"
So how was Mrs. Dahlen's presentation recorded? Judge for yourself whether Carla Dahlen's comments were accurately reflected in the minutes: "Carla Dahlen (address removed by blog author) expressed her concern that the Subdivision, Development and Serving bylaw was too subjective overall. She also requested that Council consider a threshold greater than $50,000 as proposed in Bylaw 1595" (reprinted from Council Agenda, page 2 of 138 here.)
Huh?
If those "minutes" reflect the accuracy of Council's recorded meetings, perhaps residents should donate a tape recorder for future meetings.
Back to the All Candidates' Forum:
Incumbents and new candidates were asked--by way of an audience-posed question on a card--whether they would rescind the homeowner as Developer designation (Yes or No). Some didn't listen to the question, and stated they would NOT rescind the BYLAW (that wasn't the question, folks...the homeowner as a Developer was the question!). Other candidates squirmed and waffled and offered a speech.
The incumbents seem to want it all...a sports field at the College, "because our (regional) partners are requesting it," offered Jim Garlick. Whether or not a sports field is of prime importance during an economic downturn never came up, neither did the necessity of "making do" (as many residents have been forced to accept during these times) with a retrofitted Mechanics Shop--utilizing the old Fire Hall and the existing Shop, neither did the feasibility of incurring further debt with the Shop referendum...and on and on, including the much-touted Town Centre. It seems the old Fire Hall was rented out in May of 2011 to Friends of the Library (pages 15 and 16 of 294 pages) for the budget-balancing and whopping tune of ~$480 a month. Sigh.
The incumbents simply aren't doing what we elected them to do, which is to "look after the municipality".
Yes, Nulli Secundus is no longer something to brag about.
Coldstream's new motto? Primum non nocere.
First, do no harm.
The next All Candidates' meeting, prior to the November 19th election, is slated for:
7 p.m. Monday, November 7th, at Okanagan College, Room D310.
"Do no harm? I'm not allowed to bite people," reminds Kia.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
During the all candidates meeting on Nov 7th all incumbents present (Councillor Dirk was absent) answered NO when asked if they would rescind the homeowner as Developer designation in the current bylaw. All new challengers,Hrabchuk,Mclean,Hegler and Taylor answered YES. Depending on the outcome of the election, I may not be building my new deck for another three years!
ReplyDeleteFrankly, I'm afraid to fart with this current council in power. They should be afraid though, very afraid, I think this "Reign of Stupidity" may be coming to and end... with any luck!
ReplyDeleteI have asked Gyula Kiss on his blog about "tricking" rate payers into going into debt for the firehalls and city hall... I don't expect an answer. He only allows supporting views or comments that he can run around in nonsensical circles to be published. Kiss, Garlick and Enns all need to go.
ReplyDelete