...not because it's a few days' work.
Because it's proof of local government's gouging.
"Up, up and away, in my beautiful balloon..."
Sure I knew what I paid in 2012.
After all, I wrote the cheques.
But year end is a chance to see it in black and white.
Or red, or in brackets.In all its ugliness.
That's when the inequities, the unfairness, the lack of justice becomes apparent.
And it's always local government's invoices.
They hope nobody notices their tactics.
Consider water taxes.
I'll cut to the chase and declare that this property's water costs increased by 28% from last year.
Yup...twenty-eight per cent!
Water taxes really get my goat.
And this goat knows they're only blowing smoke up your skirt when they say it's about Water Conservation.There are 4 water invoices for this property: The fire hydrant is billed annually, but the residence, irrigation, and clubhouse are billed quarterly.
Maybe quarterly billings are employed to make it easier for us to pay?
Kinda like paying for your car or fire insurance in installments.
Nah, it's so they can charge you a flat amount PLUS consumption in each Q.
Funny thing...I'm old enough to remember when a basic (minimum) charge was levied only if there was no consumption.
But I digress.
"It's to teach us to conserve the precious resource," you might say.
Bullshit.
Echoing bureaucrats' statements doesn't make it more palatable.
Last year, Highlands Golf irrigation usage was lower than in 2011.
Noteworthy for the previous year is that our irrigation consumption warranted a letter from the Regional District that proved we used only 10% (yes, one-tenth) of our paid-up annual water allocation.
No congratulations, but that's okay.
So we are conserving the water resource.
Yet our total water costs increased by $595.73 over the previous year.
That's why they call it precious.
And they manipulate timing of reading meters to serve their purposes, as in this example from Coldstream.
No date mentioned on when the meter was read.
Is that even legal?
Bureaucrats are the Tails that wag the Dogs, the elected officials.
Bureaucrats use reverse accounting to fill municipal coffers.
Governments decide upfront how much money they want and divide by the number of customers.
Governments extort money from residents with unsavory tactics. Interesting indeed there's an example of how to report such tactics from, of all places, Quebec, that historical hotbed of graft and corruption. Another deals with public sector transparency from Asia, also well-known for underhanded dealings.
Even where a community's population is increasing--and it hasn't appreciably around here--up go the rates.More than inflation, more than taxpayers' wage increases, more than can be justified...ever.
If only business could do that!
So it's increased service that raises rates?
Nope.
An example is the unparalleled gouging for Highlands' private fire hydrant which, in 10 years, has never consumed the "precious resource".
In 2012, the fire hydrant tax was $454.38.
In 2011, it was $383.80.
In 2002, it was $266.00.
And property taxes...in 2012 property taxes increased by 37.8 per cent (yup...thirty-seven point eight per cent) over 2011.
...so I posted a sign in the clubhouse to show that.
Customers expressed outrage and recounted their own tales of local government gouging.
"My kibbles only increased 3 per cent last year," admonishes Kia.
Should've bought Gold in 2005.
Just to keep up with local government's gouging.
It was $518.00 per ounce then.
