Thursday, December 12, 2013
Taxpayers Want Anti-Bloating Recipe
But whenever an ounce of government (the "system") is involved, the result is often unpalatable.
In this case the ounce of government is Victoria.
Victoria, those lard-laden halls, where everybody's an Executive-somebody, a Deputy-something, an Acting Manager-whatchamacallit, a General Manager-who'zit, with burgeoning committee and staff lists that'd make an old Rolodex crumble. And expense accounts, lots of expense accounts with little or no accountability in their contents.
How can anyone expect unionized senior civil servants in Victoria to be objective (at all--or alternately--enough) and cut out the trans fats of three local North Okanagan bureaucracies?
The patient is dying from the sticky substance called bureaucracy that clogs his arteries.
A radical change of diet is called for.
Because the same ole' can of Spam isn't going to cut it anymore.
Even in (perhaps--especially in) Victoria since the 1990's, the growth of the bureaucracy occurred virtually unchecked.
Victoria has their own Spam.
Hell, Ottawa has Spam.
Senator Spammers...
Back to Victoria.
These are the people--the only people--the "system" allows to study amalgamation in any areas of British Columbia. "We have a whole department within government for that," it's been said.
Oh goody.
So...lemme get this straight.
The Society has gone to all this petition work re amalgamating Coldstream, Vernon and Areas "B" and "C", following KPMG's Core Services Review, knowing full well that the ONLY people who are permitted--by the system--to do a study on the pros and cons of amalgamation are the people the NDP trained in the 1990's, who still sit at their desks today, left-leaners sufficiently indoctrinated long ago...staunch government employee union workers for whom the word solidarity has a special connotation.
...and THEY are going to accede to Society and taxpayer wishes by eliminating the over-governance and abject waste of money in this area by slashing the duties and jobs of their brothers and sisters?
Comrades-in-arms, minus the armbands.
"You, and you, and you...and you, we don't need you anymore."
"You and you and you...off you go to new office in a lateral move to a job that may be temporary.
And that's IF--and only IF--Vernon Mayor Sawatzky isn't the only one agreeing to do a study, pointing out "...(the process needs) at least one other willing partner."
Really?
Do you really think so?
Let's try the recipe:
Take 58,000 people, all with their own family desires and wishes and limited wallet capacity.
Throw in politicians' wish-lists: big-city-wannabe ideas like bike paths, libraries, pedestrian corridors, government-mandated "culture".
Quietly blend in $110 million Interior Health filtration.
Fold in $80 million infrastructure and "asset" replacement 'cos it was depreciated.
Increase water eight-fold, sewer by two.
With a wooden spoon, add fluffy newspaper stories.
Dangle a pound of unfunded Defined Benefit Pension plans, and Sick Days, and Six Weeks Vacation.
Beat the populace continually with increasing mil rates on property taxes.
Saute Coldstream taxpayers with RU10/RU30, ostensibly an acceptable "preservative".
Whisk until mixture froths.
Allow the mixture to rest.
Contents are beginning to stink.
Continue.
Add the zest of a Core Services Review.
The stink is reduced, albeit only temporarily.
Then rely on bureaucrats in Victoria to make this dark soup digestible.
"You forgot one tablespoon of Faith," offers Kia.
Good luck with that.
Time for a road diet.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Maybe we don't need an Amalgamation Study? The RDNO has a newly completed Annexation Study that makes a strong case for amalgamation.
ReplyDeleteDownload the Annexation Study Phase 2 Final Report here:
http://www.rdno.ca/agendas/131107_eaac_agn.pdf
From the Executive Summary:
"A key concern was the impact of annexation on the long-term sustainability of services in electoral areas. A review of service delivery found that the majority of services in the rural areas are regional or sub-regional in nature, and thus are not significantly financially impacted by annexation. Electoral area and local service area services may be financially impacted by annexation; however, the magnitude of the impact is relatively small within the context of overall regional district services."
Incremental annexations and a lack of coordinated planning between electoral areas and municipalities is cited as one of the biggest concerns. The astute reader will note that concern (lack of planning) would disappear with amalgamation.
This Annexation Study also includes a case study of the 1993 Okanagan Landing amalgamation, concluding:
"Overall, residents living in the Okanagan Landing area do not appear to have been faced with extraordinary tax increases by virtue of their properties being annexed into the City of Vernon."
Interestingly, the 1992 Sussex Restructure Study estimated an tax increase of $326 in 1992.
Meanwhile, this Urban Systems report states:
"If Electoral Area “A” had remained and not been annexed into the City, by 2012 a sample residential dwelling, assessed at $325,000, including land assessed at $155,000 and $170,000 in taxable improvements, would have generated an estimated total tax levy of $1,761. In 2012, the same property with the City would pay a total tax levy of about $2,115 in property taxes."
(i.e. a tax increase of $354 in 2012 dollars - pretty close to that estimated #326 back in 1992!)
Also interesting... Vernon Councillor Bob Spiers appears to be waking up and smelling the stinky new Parks deals. Even he seems to suggest that amalgamation will fix this schmazzle!
http://vernonblog.blogspot.ca/2013/12/councillor-says-parks-deal-is-flawed.html