Numerous discussions have been held by the public on what is Greater Vernon doing or planning now that the referendum for borrowing $70 million to fund capital projects for the 2012 Master Water Plan has failed.
Water customers wondered about the appointed laypeople (no independent consultant) Stakeholders' Advisory Committee (to the Greater Vernon Advisory Committee) that would meet once a month for a few hours, provide their "recommendation(s)" to GVAC sometime in March of 2016.
But what was happening behind closed GVW doors in the meantime?
Wonder no more.
It seems that stalling has its benefits...
The following is a cut-n-paste from Technical Memorandum #9, System Separation Option Analysis, specifically page 68 of 90 from the RDNO website's Master Water Plan.
"Should the referendum fail, then
RDNO would have to wait for an order from
Interior Health to proceed with the plan as
approved.
RDNO would then be required to process the required loan authorization
bylaws (approximately six (6) months) to authorize
construction to proceed."
The above (highlighted text) were items 5 and 6 on page 68 of the 90 page document.
Here are items 1 through 4.
Read the rest:
The Technical Committee Option
Review Workshop resulted in the decision to recommend Option 2 based on a review of 9 different
conceptual long term water supply solutions. The
key components associated with Option 2 are:
1. Continue to use Duteau Creek
and KalamalkaLake as the principal raw water
sources;
2. Add new filtration plants at
the existing Duteau Creek and Mission Hill
treatment sites;
3. Complete system separation in
the West Goose Lake area and the
Lavington/Coldstream service areas and;
4. The development of a dedicated
raw water supply for Goose Lake to reduce the
volume of treated potable water utilized
for irrigation.
Political direction has been
provided to amend Option 2 to incorporate an oversizing of
the transmission mains from Duteau Creek in the
Lavington / Coldstream area. This will allow for
complete system separation in the East Vernon
area in the future, and raw water supply to Goose Lake.
It is recognized that
implementation of the Master Water Plan as presented will be
difficult for the following reasons:
1. We are currently in mid-2013
and the projects scheduled for 2013 will not be
undertaken due to timing and funding availability.
2. To fund the first phase of
projects to 2017, RDNO will need to borrow
approximately $60 million. This will require a referendum and
realistically speaking the timing to go through this process will result in the referendum
occurring in 2014.
3. The Lavington separation
projects would then have to be rescheduled from
2015 to 2019 at the earliest.
4. The upgrading of the Duteau Creek
WTP will then be pushed back, with
pre-design and design in2016 and construction in
2017-2018 at the earliest.
(the blog highlighted text were items 5 and 6).
Stalling.
"...stalling so that GVW can create bylaws to borrow the money for each capital project," says Kia.
Because borrowing for each capital project doesn't require a referendum...only the entire Master Water Plan's capital projects required a referendum.
No wonder the majority of elected officials (on GVAC) aren't supporting
an independent consultant review of the MWP..."political direction has
been provided".
No comments:
Post a Comment
Share YOUR thoughts here...