No idea who the author is, but this compelling document landed in my
Inbox this morning:
"My fellow Canadians, you are buying
into a lie regarding our energy industry and the global environment.
We are a mere 35 million people, just
0.5% of this planet's 7.3 billion population. Our country covers roughly 10
million square kilometres of which probably 90% is realistically uninhabitable
(explaining why over 80% of our population live in urban centres within 200 kms
of the U.S. border).
We endure temperature extremes
ranging from -40C or colder to 35C or warmer. Out of necessity we need to heat
our homes for 6+ months the year. We face major transportation challenges
simply because of the geography of our country.
Yet, through all this we are
responsible for less than 0.5% of the pollution generated globally. We ARE NOT
the problem!
If every one of us here in Canada
chose to sacrifice ourselves for the betterment of mother earth and self
terminated, the positive effect on the global environment would be.....drum
roll please......zero! The global effect would actualy be negative because we
are one of the most ethical, environmentaly responsible producers of energy in
the world!
If we were out of the picture the
U.S. would be mining our oil sands before our corpses had even started giving
off methane gas. They would then proceed to build the biggest pipeline imaginable,
from Fort Mac to Texas.
Don't believe me? Lets look at some
facts. The U.S. has no problem with pipelines, U.S. pipelines that is. They
actually have over 3.2 'million' kilometres of liquid petroleum and natural gas
pipelines already. There's also the 1300 kilometre, 122cm (48 inch) line
running from Prudhoe Bay to the Valdez Marine Terminal (yes, big bad oil
tankers).
You are aware, aren't you, of the
Trans Alaskan pipeline running directly through the pristine heart of that
beautiful state? As of 2010 16 'BILLION' Barrels of oil had been transported
through this U.S. pipeline and terminal.
The U.S. also has no problem drilling
for oil in the Atlantic ocean, the Pacific ocean, the Arctic ocean or the Gulf
of Mexico yet they have the audacity to condemn Canada for mining our oil sands
in northern Alberta and Saskatchewan?
The opposition to our Canadian energy
development is a well organized attempt to keep our Canadian oil land locked so
that we are forced to sell to the U.S. and to the U.S. only and then at a very
discounted price.
The U.S. is attempting and succeeding
in preventing us from marketing our own natural resources globally to the
highest bidder. U.S. foundations (HP, Tides, et al) are funding the opposition
to our oil sands and contrary to popular belief it has absolutely nothing to do
with threats to the environment.
If they really were that concerned
about our planet why are they not protesting the real polluters, the real
threats to our environment? China, the world's worst polluter (besides having a
tragic human rights record)? No protests. Why isn't Suzuki over in Bejing
chastising Jinping?
What about the other major polluters?
Russia? The U.S. themselves? India? I can understand a Canadian that is
benefitting financially, who is receiving grants to oppose or protest or
hamstring our own resource development. What I can't understand is the rest of
my fellow Canadians buying into their bovine excrement.
In the oil sands, our very own
Canadian oil sands, we have the 3rd largest proven crude oil reserve in the
world, behind only Saudia Arabia and Venezuela (again, both with 'stellar'
human rights track records....) EVERY person in Canada, and EVERY province and
territory in Canada has benefitted tremendously, whether directly, indirectly
or both from our oil sands development. Over the next 25 years the oil sands
has the potential to generate over $1.5 TRILLION in federal and provincial
taxes and royalties. There is the potential for well over 500,000 direct and
indirect jobs.
So here's the deal my fellow
Canadians. I fear our Canadian 'goose that lays the golden egg' is suffering
the death by a thousand cuts. Alas, it may already be too late. Maybe it's
already on life support. If you share the view's of the Gore's, the Suzuki's,
and the Obama's of the world, that our Canadian energy producers and those that
work in this industry are bad and evil and a scourge on the earth, a blight on
Canada's reputation in the global community then fine, stick your fork into the
goose as well but please do not whine and complain 10 or 15 years down the road
when the wait time for your hip replacement is 3-5 years because our health
care system is underfunded and there's a severe shortage of doctors and nurses
in the system.
Meanwhile the Suzukis and their ilk
will be flying down to the Mayo clinic in a big bad fossil fuel burning jet for
their medical needs. Don't whine and complain when your grandchild's class has
a 50:1 student to teacher ratio because our education system is underfunded and
the government coffers are bare. Of course the Suzuki grandchildren will be in
private schools so no problem there. Don't whine and complain when your city's
infrastructure is decaying and falling apart and there's no money to repair it.
Instead of whining and complaining
make sure you look into the mirror and realize you believed a lie that has cost
this incredible country and our future generations an amazing opportunity to
prosper and succeed globally."
"The author, whoever he or she is, has clear vision," says Kia.
As a Kinder Morgan friend of mine recently stated, " We should just turn off the flow in the TransMountain pipeline for a few days, and watch all commerce related to transportation in the lower mainland , including air traffic, grind to a halt,,,,,,,and just maybe we would make an impression on the uninformed public". As for denigrating the oil sands, 80% of GHG emissions from fossil fuels come from use in downstream transportation, source of the resource is of little significance; California and Alaska have dirtier resources than the oil sands. And good luck with all those solar panels and wind turbines we are going to build in the next few years.....remember George Bush and the switchgrass biofuel the US was going to pursue, and Gordon Campbell and the hydrogen highway to California! Economic prosperity in this country is and will remain for decades tied to the use of readily available inexpensive fossil fuels; strangling or stranding this resource will cripple the country. I'm pretty certain Albertans will rid themselves of Notley after one term of damage!
ReplyDelete