SAC Recommendation to GVAC

What does it mean?

Well, the following is an anonymous comment that dissects what the Stakeholders' Advisory Committee is going to recommend to GVAC and, presumably, have GVAC recommend to the Board of the Regional District:

* For 20% of domestic water supply,

we'll spend tons of money

to treat agricultural irrigation water

for the next 40-50 or more years!

* We'll spend $3.5 million to increase the

size of the agriculture main...in case

we do total separation

 which of course will never happen

(due to costs)!

*We gamble on a

 small watershed competing with agriculture

to supply 20% of domestic water

for those

who never paid for the domestic supply.

So, how will 1,000 signatories to the CCMWP petition react?  

How about the ~8,000 people who voted "NO" in the water referendum?  Ooops, reduce that number by the number of politicians who swore they also did not support the $70 million borrowing referendum!  You no doubt remember who they are.

Many people will remember at the next election.

"So the SAC windup is more accurately called the SAC blowup," offers Kia.

Yessireebob.