Wednesday, January 25, 2017

Canada Will Have To Deal With It



This blog doesn't often post "internet stuff", but there's a journalist named Ian O'Doherty, who writes for a publication called the Irish Independent, with a compelling take on circumstances that resulted in the election results in the U.S.A.

First the preamble to Ian Doherty's article, from an email.

"It's interesting that such a perceptive analysis comes all the way from Ireland. From outside the USA it has been clear for many years that the country was stumbling and the average American knew it, they could see it all around them. Average Joe and Jane Citizen have seen their jobs exported, being replaced more and more with a welfare state. The hope and expectation of a steady job that provided a good living and the opportunity to own their own home, secure a comfortable retirement and a solid future for their children  has faded along with their buying power. The elitist overpaid politicians, entertainers and influential journalists genuinely believed they represented the average American, that their identity was the American identity. They had no clue or empathy of the struggles and helplessness of trying to just keep a roof over your head and food on the table which is the life of so many people. These people are the true middle class America and they don't want handouts or welfare, they want meaningful jobs so they can build a future and maybe engage in the American dream again. They aren't stupid or uninformed, they know they have been suckered for years and they finally saw a slim chance to change the system in favour of the common working person again. In Donald Trump the majority saw the only possibility to change the system that had for years been grinding them down. Can he do it? Only time will tell, the next four years certainly will be interesting."

Did this "reasoning" lead to Trump's victory?

The following is Ian's article.  Highlighted phrases were by anonymous contributors to the email.

From: A Two Fingers to a Politically Correct Elite":  by Ian O'Doherty
Ian O'Doherty is a columnist who works for the Irish Independent.  His "iSpy" column is published Monday to Thursday and contains news articles blended with comedy and shock-jock opinions.

Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - either a day that will live in infamy, or the moment when America was made great again?  The truth, as usual, will lie somewhere in the middle. After all, contrary to what both his supporters and detractors believe, Trump won't be able to come into office and spend his first 100 days gleefully ripping up all the bits of the Constitution he doesn't like.

But even if the American election's seismic shock-wave doesn't signal either the sky falling or the start of a bright new American era, the result was, to use one of The Donald's favourite phrases, huge. It is, in fact, a total game changer.

In decades to come, historians will still bicker about the most poisonous, toxic and stupid election in living memory.  They will also be bickering over the same vexed question - how did a man who was already unpopular with the public and who boasted precisely zero political experience beat a seasoned Washington insider who was married to one extremely popular president and who had worked closely with another? The answer, ultimately, is in the question.

History will record this as a Trump victory, which of course it is. But it was also more than that, because this was the most stunning self-inflicted defeat in the history of Western democracy.

Hillary Clinton has damned her party to irrelevance for at least the next four years. She has also ensured that Obama's legacy will now be a footnote rather than a chapter. Because the Affordable Care Act is now doomed under a Trump presidency and that was always meant to be Obama's gift, of sorts, to America.

How did a candidate who had virtually all of the media, all of Hollywood, every celebrity you could think of, a couple of former presidents and apparently, the hopes of an entire gender resting on her shoulders, blow up her own campaign?

I rather suspect that neither Donald nor Hillary know how they got to this point.

Where she seemed to expect the position to become available to her by right - the phrase "she deserves it" was used early in the campaign and then quickly dropped when her team remembered that Americans don't like inherited power - his first steps into the campaign were those of someone chancing their arm. If Trump wasn't such a staunch teetotaler, many observers would have accused him of only doing it as a drunken bet.

But the more the campaign wore on, something truly astonishing began to happen - the people began to speak. And they began to speak in a voice which, for the first time in years in the American heartland, would not be ignored.

Few of the people who voted for Trump seriously believe that he is going to personally improve their fortunes. Contrary to the smug, middle-class media narrative, Trump voters aren't all barely educated idiots.
They know what he is; of course they do. It's what he is not that appeals to them.

Clinton, on the other hand, had come to represent the apex of smug privilege. Whether it was boasting about her desire to shut down the remaining coal industry in Virginia, or calling half the electorate a "basket of deplorables", she seemed to operate in the perfumed air of the elite, more obsessed with coddling idiots and pandering to identity and feelings than improving the hardscrabble life that is the lot of millions of Americans.


Also, nobody who voted for Trump did so because they wanted him as a spiritual guru or life coach. But plenty of people invested an irrational amount of emotional energy into a woman who was patently undeserving of that level of adoration.

That's why we've witnessed such fury from her supporters - they had wrapped themselves so tightly in the Hillary flag that a rejection of her felt like a rejection of them. And when you consider that many American colleges gave their students Wednesday off class because they were too 'upset' to study, you can see that this wasn't a battle for the White House - this became a genuine battle for America's future direction. And, indeed, for the
West.

We have been going through a cultural paroxysm for the last 10 years - the rise of identity politics has created a Balkanised society where the content of someone's mind is less important than their skin colour, gender, sexuality or whatever other attention-seeking label they wish to bestow upon themselves. In fact, where once it looked like racism and sexism might be becoming archaic remnants of a darker time, a whole new generation has popped
up which wants to re-litigate all those arguments all over again.

In fact, while many of us are too young to recall the Vietnam War and the social upheaval of the 1960s, plenty of older observers say they haven't seen an America more at war with itself than it is today.

One perfect example of this new America has been the renewed calls for segregation on campuses. Even a few years ago, such a move would have been greeted with understandable horror by civil rights activists - but this time it's the black students demanding segregation and "safe spaces" from whites. If young people calling for racial segregation from each other isn't the sign of a very, very sick society, nothing is.

The irony and hypocrisy of Clinton calling Trump and his followers racist while she was courting Black Lives Matter was telling.  After all, no rational white person would defend the KKK, yet here was a white women defending both BLM and the New Black Panthers - explicitly racist organisations with the NBP, in particularly, openly espousing a race war if they don't get what they want.

Fundamentally, Trump was attractive because he represents a repudiation of the nonsense that has been slowly strangling the West.  He represents - rightly or wrongly - a scorn and contempt for these new rules. He won't be a president worried about micro-aggression, or listening to the views of patently insane people just because they come from a fashionably protected group.  He also represents a glorious two fingers to everyone who has become sick of being called a racist or a bigot or a homophobe - particularly by Hillary supporters who are too dense to realise that she has always actually been more conservative on social issues than Trump.

That it might take a madman to restore some sanity to America is, I suppose, a quirk that is typical to that great nation - land of the free and home to more contradictions than anyone can imagine.

Trump's victory also signals just how out of step the media has been with the people. Not just American media, either.  In fact, the Irish media has continued its desperate drive to make a show of itself with a seemingly endless parade of emotionally incontinent gibberish that, ironically, has increased in ferocity and hysterical spite in the last few days.

The fact that Hillary's main cheerleaders in the Irish and UK media still haven't realised where they went wrong is instructive and amusing in equal measure. They still don't seem to understand that by constantly insulting his supporters, they're just making asses of themselves.

One female contributor to this newspaper said Trump's victory was a "sad day for women". Well, not for the women who voted for him it wasn't.

But that really is the nub of the matter - the 'wrong' kind of women obviously voted for Trump. The 'right' kind went with Hillary. And lost.

The Irish media are not alone in being filled largely with dinner-party liberals who have never had an original or socially awkward thought in their lives. They simply assume that everyone lives in the same bubble and thinks the same thoughts - and if they don't, they should.

Of the many things that have changed with Trump's victory, the bubble has burst. Never in American history have the polls, the media and the chin-stroking moral arbiters of the liberal agenda been so spectacularly, wonderfully wrong. It was exactly that condescending, obnoxious sneer towards the working class that brought them out in such numbers, and that is the great irony of Election 2016 - the Left spent years creating identity politics to the extent that the only group left without protection or a celebrity sponsor was the white American male. That it was the white American male who swung it for Trump is a timely reminder that while black lives matter, all votes count - even the ones of people you despise.

You don't have to be a supporter of Trump to take great delight in the sheer, apoplectic rage that has greeted his victory. If Clinton had won and Trump supporters had gone on a rampage through a dozen American cities the next night, there would have been outrage - and rightly so.

But in a morally and linguistically inverted society, the wrong-doers are portrayed as the victims. We saw that at numerous Trump rallies - protesters would disrupt the event, claiming their right to free speech (a heckler's veto is not free speech) and provoking people until they got a dig before running to the media and claiming victim-hood.

Yet none of Clinton's rallies were shut down by her opponents (unlike Trump's aborted Chicago meeting) and the great mistake the anti-Trump zealots should have learned was that just thinking you're right isn't enough - you need to convince others as well.

But, ultimately, this election was about people saying "enough with the bullshit". This is a country in crisis, and most Americans don't care about transgender bathrooms, or "safe" spaces, or government speech laws. This was about people taking some control back for themselves.

It was about them saying that they won't be hectored and bullied by the toddler tantrums thrown by pissy and spoiled millennials, and they certainly won't put up with being told they're delorable, stupid and wicked just because they have a difference of opinion.

But, really, this election is about hope for a better America; an America which isn't obsessed with identity and perceived 'privilege'; an America where being a victim isn't a virtue and where you don't have to apologise for not being up to date with the latest list of socially acceptable phrases.

Trump's victory was a two fingers to the politically correct.  It was a brutal rejection of the nonsense narrative which says Muslims who kill Americans are somehow victims. It took the ludicrous Green agenda and threw it out. It was a return, on some level, to a time when people weren't afraid to speak their own mind without some self-elected language cop shouting at you. Who knows, we may even see Trump kicking the UN out of New York.

Frankly, if you're one of those who gets their politics from Jon Stewart, CNN and Twitter, look away for the next four years, because you're not going to like what you see. The rest of us, however, will be delighted.

This might go terribly, terribly wrong. Nobody knows - and if we have learned anything this week, it's that "Nobody knows nuthin".  But just as the people of the UK took control back with Brexit, the people of America did likewise with their choice for president.

It's called democracy. Deal with it." 



...and in Canada?     Hmmm.

Tuesday, January 24, 2017

Whatz-it?

On Buchanan Road today.




"...or maybe Whyz-it?", Kia would've asked.

Surveying a road during winter.
Not likely.

Probably to gauge the size of the work at the pit...





Sunday, January 22, 2017

Believing His Own Publicity


Must've been a slow news week.

Today's Morning Star article "Coldstream mayor contemplates future" by Jennifer Smith precedes the next municipal election by two years.

But Mayor Garlick is featured as indicating it may be "his last term as top dog".  Seems he's contemplating running as a councillor.

Dog indeed.

Described by Smith as "forward thinking", Garlick blathers on about working (Smith calls it tirelessly) on projects and initiatives both locally and regionally.

This blog's opinions will follow the newspaper story, whose last half is reproduced:

"With the new rail trail making tracks in Coldstream, plans are underway to facilitate the additional amenity.
Coldstream recently purchased a two-hectare lot on Kalamalka Road next to the Alpine Centre for rail trail parking.

'I'd like to see some commercial component to it as well,' said Garlick.

This land is Coldstream's newest jewel, with a thought to 3 future commercial buildings and 150 parking spaces.


Using the Alexander's liquor store site as an example, Garlick says they could fit three buildings the size of the store on that property plus 150 parking spaces.  Development there would also lead to an intersection at Guildford Court.

As Coldstream looks at this and other growing trends such as mobile vendors and airbnbs, it is(sic) also updated some antiquated plans.

Staff and council recently finished the Official Community Plan and are now looking at rewriting the zoning bylaw.

'It's been around for decades,' said Garlick of the amendment-riddled document.

Plans for replacement of the Women's Institute Hall are also at the drawing board.

'We need to look at what it is we want there, how big it would be and cost for it,' said Garlick, suggesting residents could be voting twice in 2018.  'If we were to go to referendum what it would cost.'

But Garlick's focus extends beyond the Coldstream borders, as several regional issues weigh on his mind.  He is eager to continue growth with Greater Vernon's master water plan.

'We spent all that time and effort at the beginning of 2016 with the stakeholders(sic) committee but it kind of died,' said the Greater Vernon Advisory Committee member. 'Where are we going?  What direction are we going?'..."

Okay, okay...enough...
This blog will address Garlick's comment on the stakeholders' committee at the end.

First, the purchase of the 2-hectare property.
Cost was somewhere in the ~$550,000 neighbourhood.
Mayor Garlick sees it as the northern terminus of the new rail trail, and he envisions three commercial buildings there, replete with 150 parking spaces.

A couple of problems with that, mister mayor.
1.  riparian setback will apply because of the creek that runs through the property.  Even years-ago,  snowplow contractors were forced to stop piling snow onto that land because of the likelihood of environmental damage to the creek from brake dust, oil, salt, and other contaminants found within road snow.  This Google maps link shows the subject property north of Dutch's campground, bordered by the railway lines on one side and Kalamalka Lake Road on the other.
2.  and why would there suddenly become an intersection with Guildfort Crt, whose 20-30 mobile homes certainly don't need an intersection (presumably with a light) to enter/leave the property.
3.  the northern terminus of the rail trail isn't a done deal, or is it?  What if it physically ends at the bottom of Kickwillie Loop, easily 2 km south of the purchased property.  Does mister mayor believe people will ride/hike/hitch past Kal Lake Store and Kal Beach to attend one of mister mayor's three commercial buildings with their 150 parking spots?


Next, mister mayor wants to rewrite the amendment-riddled zoning bylaw, it having "been around for decades".
1.  So, is it because it's been around for decades or because it's amendment-riddled?
Neither is a justifiable reason to rewrite the document.  Variances and amendments can (and do) pop up before the ink is dry on any document.  So is the mayor promoting redoing anything if it's been around for decades?  In other words, because of elapsed time?
It's probably because the Official Community Plan--also around for decades--has just been rewritten.
So it's not because a document is full of amendments.
It's because of age...
And bureaucrats who need to fill their days with meaningful paperwork and who want to add new stuff, little stuff, here and there and everywhere.
Maybe even mister mayor's wish to remove any possibility of future site-specific zoning, perhaps?
Ahem.

Then, the Women's Institute Hall.
Or, rather, the replacement of it.
Mister mayor mentioned that taxpayers could be voting twice in 2018 if there's a referendum on the women's institute hall replacement. 
Funny thing, though.
We residents must have missed the vote on a referendum to purchase the Women's Institute Hall a few years back.

Okay, we're almost at mister mayor's comment about the stakeholders' committee and the master water plan.

Let's begin with a quote from Mr. Don Graham, who wrote a letter to the editor January 6/17:

"The minute I receive a bill for water that includes the new rate increase,
 I am selling my home and moving to a place that has reasonable water rates.
  There is no reason that we are required to pay three times the cost of water
 that they do in Kelowna
 when there is an abundance of water in the Vernon area.
  The regional district has finally found a way to extract more money from us."
   Don Graham, on the 11.5% water increase over the next 3 years

and remembering a consultant's comment from the SAC meetings:
"You (Vernon area) are blessed with loads of water."

Yes, indeed, Mr. Graham, they have.
And it's been occurring for eight to 10 years already. 
And yes, Mr. Consultant, el Nino has been good to us.
You, Mr. Consultant, knew--and saw--the manipulation by politicians.
But we all know you are paid by them.  
Or, actually, us.

It's politicians like mister mayor and bureaucrats who are pushing residents to the brink.

Okay, now to my biggest thorn:  'We spent all that time and effort at the beginning of 2016 with the stakeholders(sic) committee but it kind of died,' said the Greater Vernon Advisory Committee member.'  

Spent all that time?
Kind of died?

How insulting that comment is from mister mayor!
Disgusting, considering he was the puppet master, pulling members' strings, not to mention the sidelong glances.
And then mister mayor fakes innocence.
 
He himself routinely manipulated--basically led by the nose--committee members, most of whom were novices to community involvement.  
And once Coldstream Councillor Kiss' GVAC involvement was challenged on a paperwork technicality, did mister mayor during the next Coldstream council meeting officially appoint Councillor Kiss to GVAC water director because of his vast experience with the water plan?
No!
But he could have.
And he should have!

Mister mayor gave the nod to Councillor Dirk, who has been at fewer water meetings than the number of fingers on one hand.



 


 

"One would think Garlick would be dizzy from all the spin he creates," Kia would've said.

Agreed.
His pirouettes border on miraculous.

One more thought to add to Ayn Rand's quote:  Four-year terms are the deathknell of democracy.


Saturday, January 21, 2017

Majestic Hunter No More


So sad.

A majestic bird of prey, this Red Tailed Hawk was likely a juvenile...to get so close to dangerous obstacles during his attack.
Perhaps the promise of a Quail dinner reduced his usual caution around structures that people build.
Perhaps as a juvenile he was still learning.
Perhaps his hunger was, at that moment, more important.

But it's ruined my day...my week.

(click to enlarge photos)

Magnificent, even in death.

Both wings were caught in the wrought-iron fence, with his neck likely broken.

I fervently hope his death was immediate

His body can be seen caught in the fence above the rock wall...with Quail feeding below.



No matter that the Red Tail Hawk's conservation status is listed as being of "least concern", it's a devastating occurrence at our home.



"While I fly, follow me in the shadow of my wings."
Jatayu, The Ramayana

Source:  Noble Bird of Prey


Wednesday, January 18, 2017

Strength in Numbers?


Or, maybe like Saskatchewan, a better deal when going alone?

Premiers of Canada's most populous provinces fired off a letter to the Feds on health funding.

But Saskatchewan's "deal" only gives them a one year reprieve.
Their argument is that private MRI clinics do not hurt the province's health care industry.
The federal government says they do.



And we all know the private clinics--long touted as enabling a two-tier health system--does not hurt the system (with the exception of the Feds' funding stance!  Because the feds make the rules, and have been known to take their bat and ball and go home.)

Look at it this way:
If the wealthy wish to access a private in-province clinic, they can.  And will.
If the wealthy wish to access a private out-of-province clinic, they can.  And will.
If the wealthy wish to access a private out-of-country clinic, they can.  And will.

The effect?
A shorter wait list for the un-wealthy is the consequence.

The unwealthy are all the other folks.
You and me and our neighbours.
The 99 per cent.

"Anyone with elementary math can understand that," Kia would've said.

Unless the feds continue tipping the "playing field", as they're wont to do...sideline deals, the feds' ultimate coercion weapon.

So, will Saskatchewan join the populous provinces within the next year?
We'll see whether the provinces' strength in numbers prevails.



Tuesday, January 10, 2017

Water Meter Readings...Part II (beginning 4th Q 2016), at bottom



The latest water meter readings--and invoicing--have been updated, and are located below.  Note that the yearly summaries, for some reason, would not allow more data to be entered --> at the bottom of this page.

Oh well, we'll just start a new blog entry page here...

 
Water Invoices:
Residence:  Oct.1/17-Dec.31/17:  base $90.00, consump 34 m3 = $27.88, water meter renewal fee under 26 mm under 1.0 $7.07, total invoice $124.95

Clubhouse: Oct.1/17-Dec.31/17:  base $360.00, consump 6m3 = $4.92, water meter renewal fee under 26 mm under 1.0 $7.07, total invoice $371.99

Irrigation:  Oct.1/17-Dec.31/17:  consump 0m3, water meter renewal fee 27-55mm 1.5-2.0 = $35.35, unmetered fire main 150 mm $33.00, total invoice $68.35

Water Invoices:
Residence:  July1/17-Sept.30/17:  base $90.00, consump $196.80 for 120 m3, water meter renewal fee under 26 mm, under 1.0 $7.07, total invoice $293.87

Clubhouse:  July1/17-Sept.30/17: base $360.00, consump 19 m3 = $15.58, water meter renewal fee under 26 mm under 1.0 $7.07, total invoice $382.65

Irrigation:  July1/17-Sept.30/17:  consump 2,225 m3 = $2,914.75, water meter renewal fee 27-55 mm, 1.5-2.0 $35.35, unmetered fire main 150mm $33.00, total invoice $2,983.10

Water Invoices:
Residence:  Apr.1/17-June30/17:  base $90.00, consump 45 m3 = $41.00, water meter renewal fee under 26 mm under 1.0 $7.07, total invoice $138.07

Clubhouse:  Apr.1/17-June30/17:  base $360.00, consump 11 m3 = $9.02, water meter renewal fee under 26 mm under 1.0 $7.07, total invoice $376.09

Irrigation:  Apr.1/17-June30/17:  consump $1,213.06, 926 m3, water meter renewal fee 27-55 mm 1.5-2.0 $35.35, unmetered fire main 150mm $33.00, total invoice $1,281.41


Water Invoices, meters read ?? (end of March, 2017?)
Residence:  Jan.1/17-Mar.31/17: base $95.00, consumption 28m3 = $22.12, water meter renewal fee under 26mm under 1.0 $7.00, total invoice $124.12

Clubhouse: Jan.1/17-Mar.31/17:  base $95.00, consumption 0m3, water meter renewal fee under 26mm under 1.0 $7.00, total invoice $102.00

Irrigation:  Jan.1/17-Mar.31/17:  base $95.00, consumption 0m3, water meter renewal fee 27-55mm 1.5-2.0 $35.00, unmetered fire main 150 mm $33.00, total invoice $163.00.



Water Invoices, meters read ??? (end of first week of Dec./16)?

Residence:  Oct.1/16-Dec.31/16: base $95.00, consumption 7 m3 = $5.53, water meter renewal fee $7.00, total invoice $107.53.

Clubhouse:  Oct.1/16-Dec.31/16:  base $95.00, consumption 6 m3 = $9.48, water meter renewal fee $7.00, total invoice $111.48.

Irrigation:  Oct. 1/16-Dec.31/16:  base $95.00, consumption 0 m3, water meter renewal fee $35.00, unmetered fire main 33.00, total invoice $163.00.

         Repeating a Comment from an anonymous poster:  "
The new rates effective April 1, 2016 will actually reduce the Irrigation rate in those quarters where you have 0m3 consumption from the $208.00 minimum (which has been eliminated) to a $35.00 for your 27-39mm meter replacement fee. Saving of $173.00.

Your Clubhouse charge will be reduced from $38.00 per quarter minimum to a $7.00 per quarter meter have. A saving of $28.00 in those quarters where you have no consumption."






"Boy, oh boy, there sure are gremlins in the blog post editor tonight," Kia would've said.

Yup...if I remove the duplicate table, both of them disappear!

Impossible to just remove one of them.   Oh well.


Sunday, January 8, 2017

Camille's Nightmare


To be blunt, Camille Marten's nightmare is the Regional District of North Okanagan.

A sentiment shared by many people over the years, I might add.

"The building was there when the business owner purchased it in 2009,
 and the RDNO was consulted as to its proposed use.
 It has passed all fire and health and safety inspections
 and has been cooperative with the RDNO
 throughout this exhausting two year process,
 and now, because of a minor technicality that can be fixed
 with the stroke of a pen, it faces closure."
Rolke, Morning Star                  

"Bin der, dun dat," I recall.

And RDNO/GVAC elected officials--goaded into adhering to the tomes of paperwork by bureaucrats--are mildly fussing that Camille's Rhythmic Gymnastics facility "may not be allowed to use a building on East Vernon Road because of zoning issues," as reported by the Morning Star in a couple of recent articles.

Or it should be stated to continue using it.

As Rolke reported:  "
"Although the business has worked diligently with the district and has met all health and safety conditions set out by the district, a new issue has arisen because the size of the building is slightly too large for its permitted use within the Agricultural Land Reserve," said Vernon councillor Scott Anderson.

"The building was there when the business owner purchased it in 2009, and the RDNO was consulted as to its proposed use. It has passed all fire and health and safety inspections and has been cooperative with the RDNO throughout this exhausting two year process, and now, because of a minor technicality that can be fixed with the stroke of a pen, it faces closure."

So the building is slightly too large?
Huh?
The Gymnastics club has used the building for years.
 
I'm thinking that some bored bureaucrat decided to whittle away an otherwise unproductive afternoon by reading the size rules for non-farm use of buildings on ALR land.

Hoping to score merit points with his superior, he had an "aha" moment and the bureaucrat felt it made sense to not allow Vernon's Olympic champion, Camille, to continue using it.


Canadian--as well as American--bureaucracy.
 Martens says "it's been a two-year nightmare."

She's wrong.
Dead wrong.
The nightmare never ends.

No matter that most of the area's elected officials appear to support Camille's facility.
And one or two of them are concerned "at how RDNO has been portrayed by the media and some residents," according to BX-Silver Star director Mike Macnabb.

Concerned how RDNO has been portrayed?
Jeez!
Who cares how RDNO has been portrayed!

Because it's the truth.

We are over-governed.
We are over-regulated.
Over-everything-ed, yup, that's the lot of residents in the North Okanagan.

Bureaucracy's foibles--and the elected officials who allow bureaucratic misfits to create such mayhem--are a lifelong nightmare.

"Camille may need a sleeping pill," Kia would've said, "to get through the rest of the process of 'legitimizing' the business she's been running for many years."

Yup.
Took me a few years to finally overcome/wake up from the Highlands Golf zoning nightmare too.



...and elected officials openly wonder why business avoids locating in the North Okanagan!
Duh!

Saturday, January 7, 2017

Way to Go, Bob


and thank you for what you do!

Bob Spiers, city of Vernon Councillor is at it again.
And we should all be grateful for his efforts.

Efforts...plural.
Because he's done it before.

The present Tax on a Tax petition already has 444 signatures from British Columbia alone (we in British Columbia have had the dubious pleasure of paying carbon taxes since 2008 when Premier Clark enacted the law.)

Canadians appear to have forgotten that they have something called "choice"



Rather than steal Bob's thunder, we'll send you to Bob's blog to click on the petition link and add your name.  And please send the story/link to ALL your email contacts in Canada!

Petition to the Government of Canada
Whereas:
The Government of British Columbia instituted a carbon tax in 2008 and the federal government GST (currently at 5%) is still being charged on this carbon tax.
We, the undersigned, citizens of Canada, call upon the Government of Canada to eliminate the GST being charged on this or any other future carbon tax enacted by the provinces or territories.
 



"Once government gets a taste of a new tax," Kia would've mused "its appetite isn't easily sent back to the diet table."


Remember to send the petition link (from Bob's blog, provided above) to all your Canadian email contacts.

Do it now.

Not sure why you're signing?
Well, in case you've spent the last number of years under a rock...click for explanations:
 
What is carbon tax?  
By the way, carbon tax failed in Australia.  Maybe we can hope for the same here in Canada...eventually.
What is GST?

Then...crawl out from under the rock.
 

Bureaucrats "Misappropriating" Data?


Fudging.
Flat out lying.
That's probably more accurate.

Yup, that's what bureaucrats do.
The end justifies the means.

Anyone with half a brain who was involved in the year-long Stakeholders' Advisory Committee meetings at RDNO regarding the Master Water Plan will know.

Remember when all the Technical Memoranda (1 through 9) and bureaucrat/consultant submissions and publications stated that agricultural water use wasn't expected to increase beyond reported (current) levels?

The bureaucratic requisite...


The Rolke story entitled "Regional growth strategy on track" (January 4/17) kinda disputes that and confirms what most people have suspected/known all along.

Judge for yourself:

"...The growth strategy is also focused on supporting farming and there has been an increase in the agricultural land base."

'Farm diversity is up,' said Marnie Skobalski, planner.

'The range of farm commodities being produced is on the rise'."


Not just "the range"...the sheer number of farm properties is wayyyyyy up.
Get in your car and drive around.
See for yourself.
See the formerly fallow land (from previous drive-arounds) that are now planted to new orchards, for example.

Is agricultural water use increasing?
You bet your socks it is!
But the numbers won't be released by RDNO/GVW for at least a few more years, as is typical.

"Maybe they're watering with IOUs," Kia would've said, "for their water arrears."

In addition to increased crop plantings, there's also a huge increase in the number of Rent-a-Cow farmers.  (Renting part of your land gives you--the homeowner--the farm rate for property taxes...plus of course the dirt-cheap water rate).




What we all learn from bureaucrats at GVW and RDNO



  Priceless.

Tuesday, January 3, 2017

Tax It Until Government Owns It


Holy Toledo!

B.C. Assessment has mailed out 2017 notices of property value changes.

According to KISS-FM news website, here's the teaser:


Jurisdiction -- 2016 Assessment Roll --  2017 Assessment Roll --  Typical % change in value

Penticton    $ 404,400     $ 434,100    +7.3%
Penticton (Strata)    $ 228,800     $ 247,800     +8.3%
Summerland    $ 452,000     $ 505,600    +11.9%
Keremeos    $ 233,300     $ 256,000    +9.7%
Oliver    $ 312,800     $ 330,400    +5.6%
Osoyoos    $ 371,200     $ 406,700    +9.6%
Princeton    $ 197,200     $ 203,600    +3.2%
Kelowna    $ 561,600     $ 624,000    +11.1%
Kelowna (Strata)    $ 285,400     $ 325,900    +14.2%
Peachland    $ 475,900     $ 527,500    +10.8%
Lake Country    $ 545,200     $ 634,000    +16.3%
West Kelowna    $ 535,800     $ 593,000    +10.7%
Armstrong    $ 312,000     $ 330,500    +5.9%
Enderby    $ 242,300     $ 262,300    +8.3%
Vernon    $ 412,800     $ 444,100    +7.6%
Vernon (Strata)    $ 219,100     $ 230,900    +5.4%
Coldstream    $ 543,600    $ 581,300    +6.9%
Salmon Arm    $ 350,500    $ 375,900    +7.2%
Spallumcheen    $ 360,900    $ 374,000    +3.6%
Sicamous    $ 298,500    $ 317,700    +6.4%
Lumby    $ 265,500    $ 280,800    +5.8%


Teaser?
Before we even receive them in the mail?

"More like being beaten prior to a scheduled poisoning," Kia would've said.


And local government says they're "holding" tax increases to--approximately--the cost of living (~about 2%).

So we'll be at a property tax increase that approaches 10 per cent.

If local government DOES NOT increase the mill rate...

 

Happy New Year....sort of


Sheesh, are we ever missing el Nino!
Weather and other stuff...
'Coz la Nina is turning out to be a very bad girl, with -17C mornings.
And daytime temps barely rising by 5 or 6 degrees.

Feels like a new Little Ice Age right now...


And my Mom's in hospital; chiefly with age related symptoms as she's 93.
She had frequently been losing her balance, and with the fear of falling, she adopted more sedentary days.
That led to other things.
But she's receiving excellent care at the new hospital tower, in a private room with her own bathroom.

A wonderful walk-in shower; note the designer wallpaper above the tiles.

Why don't our homes have bathrooms like this?
People would be able to age in place...longer.

Back to Mom's situation. 
There'll be a discussion with Interior Health in the next day or two about the urgency for Mom's assisted living need, despite the purported "6-8 month wait" list.


Yes, the New Year.
As widely reported, it's the time for price increases to take effect.
Hydro, insurance, water, medical premiums, property taxes etc. etc.; the list goes on.

No wonder people drink.

But wait until you see your property tax increases!
Remember that assessments each year are based on the previous July's assessed value!
And we all know what happened to property values in B.C. last summer.

For that reason, don't feel placated by your City's reported "2-something percent" increases.
As the euphemism goes "cost of living increase...my arse".
Sounds like assessments are going up by almost 8 per cent...(some as high as 30 per cent)...without any announced increase in your community's mill rates.  Yet.

What else is new?

Oh yes, received a note that my submission to Hydro's request for public comment on their tiered rate for electricity was accepted before the end of November deadline.  After a bit of digging, discovered my submission here.
If you're ever suffering from insomnia, here's the list of all the submissions....scroll down to the very bottom and click on “E Exhibits – Letters of Comment”.

And the threat of huge water increases deserves a mention.
Same ole, same ole in many ways, with Greater Vernon Water saying that rates will go up by about 2 per cent.

"...all they have been doing
 over the last several years
 is taking our money
 without spending any of it."
 Coldstream Councillor Pat Cochrane                   

Highlands Golf--and the other much larger irrigation users--will be hit especially hard in 2017.
The proposal is for ICI customers (industrial, commercial, institutional) to pay residential water rates for the first 1,000 cubic metres.

That proposal is one segment of the recommended 2017 Water Rate Pricing submitted to the Greater Vernon Advisory Committee (some of whom have residences that are on well water and, frankly, probably don't give a damn what water rates are!)

The 40-page proposal is worth a read, folks!
The proposal is for rates to increase almost 4 per cent annually for each of the next three years.

One very interesting comment from Coldstream councillor Pat Cochrane was reported in the newspaper:  "At some point it gets a little silly to keep increasing the rates when you have money in the bank."  He concluded "...all they have been doing over the last several years is taking our money without spending any of it."  It took a long, long time but Councillor Gyula Kiss has a new ally in Councillor Cochrane. 


But don't believe that as it's with the typical condition that GVW imposes:  that they don't lose the revenue from large water users.  (Large water users doesn't include agricultural...'coz they don't pay bugger all to begin with, so the utility will NEVER lose those customers.  On the contrary, agriculture water use is increasing like mad, although it'll take the water utility a couple of years to report that).

A recent quote from letter-writer Jim Miles--whose sentiments mirror even the Occupy movement's meme--concluded a letter he submitted on another topic.  It went thus:

"...also know that the elites, the governments, the media and the powers continually lie to the populace, manufacturing consent for aggression, to serve their own interests, not the interests of the farmers, factory workers, labourers and the every day citizens of the world."
    Jim Miles...............
Jim Miles obviously isn't fooled.
Speaking of serving their own interests, have a look at this report of executive compensation.

"Feeling alone, despite being part of the 99 per cent," Kia would've said.

Ain't that the truth!

Is it 5 o'clock somewhere?
Probably in the boardrooms of the nation.

Thankfully, there's one very good thing: 

Grandson was loving the weather...

Thank God for grandchildren!

A lot of topics dumped into this one post...a catch-up.