Saturday, May 21, 2016

SAC Recommendation to GVAC


What does it mean?

Well, the following is an anonymous comment that dissects what the Stakeholders' Advisory Committee is going to recommend to GVAC and, presumably, have GVAC recommend to the Board of the Regional District:

* For 20% of domestic water supply,
we'll spend tons of money
to treat agricultural irrigation water
for the next 40-50 or more years!

* We'll spend $3.5 million to increase the
size of the agriculture main...in case
we do total separation
 which of course will never happen
(due to costs)!

*We gamble on a
 small watershed competing with agriculture
to supply 20% of domestic water
for those
who never paid for the domestic supply.



So, how will 1,000 signatories to the CCMWP petition react?  
How about the ~8,000 people who voted "NO" in the water referendum?  Ooops, reduce that number by the number of politicians who swore they also did not support the $70 million borrowing referendum!  You no doubt remember who they are.
Many people will remember at the next election.





"So the SAC windup is more accurately called the SAC blowup," offers Kia.

Yessireebob.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Share YOUR thoughts here...